Carbon tax mistake consigned to dustbin - QRC

ONE of Australia’s biggest public policy mistakes in decades has been fittingly consigned to the dustbin with today’s repeal of the carbon tax legislation.

Queensland Resources Council Chief Executive Michael Roche said that with the net cost of the carbon tax to the Queensland resources sector approaching $700 million this financial year, its axing would come as welcome relief for mineral and energy exporters. 

"Repeal of the carbon tax is good news for the Queensland economy," Mr Roche said.

"The carbon tax was a massive double-fail.

"It failed to achieve its environmental objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while loading the Australian economy with costs over and above anything imposed on minerals and energy export competitors.

"Report after report found that energy-intensive industries were likely to shift out of Australia to countries without an onerous tax on carbon."

A Griffith University study for the US-based Institute for Energy Research released last September concluded that carbon leakage was one of the most important lessons learned from the introduction of Australia's carbon tax.

The report said: "The effect of a carbon tax on emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industries is similar to a tax on exports or a tax on import-competing industries. Domestic emissions in these industries may fall after a carbon tax is imposed, but that cannot be counted as an environmental gain if the ultimate effect is that emissions simply rise overseas. The net effect is a pure deadweight cost to the economy." (link to report below) 

Mr Roche said the resources sector had argued consistently that without global alignment in emissions management, the imposition of a broad and expensive domestic carbon price would damage the Australian economy without benefit to the environment.

"Fixing the carbon tax – as advocated by the federal opposition – is not just a question of the price. 

"Dropping the carbon tax and adopting Europe’s emissions trading system would require a massive design overhaul as the European scheme provides genuine protection for the international competitiveness of its trade-exposed industries. 

"Furthermore, and crucially for Queensland, it excludes fugitive emissions from coal mining. Australia’s carbon tax regime afforded no such protections."

Mr Roche said the Queensland resources sector supported a measured transition to a low-emissions economy, subject to major global emitters and Australia’s resource competitors moving in the same direction.

"An effective policy response to managing climate change requires a global agreement on greenhouse gas abatement including comparable emissions-reduction commitments from all major emitting nations, substantial global investment in low emissions technologies and mechanisms to encourage the lowest-cost abatement.

"The Abbott Government’s Direct Action model correctly targets abatement where it is achievable through the provision of direct incentives.

"This contrasts with the approach of the former carbon pricing scheme which was characterised by a blunt and punitive tax on a firm’s entire CO2 emissions footprint, irrespective of whether the firm had the capacity to reduce those emissions," he said.

www.qrc.org.au

Deadweight Down Under: Australia's Carbon Tax - Dr Alex Robson, Griffith University, Queensland

 

ends