TPL_YOOTHEME_SKIP_TO_MAIN_CONTENT

Business News Releases

Public Works Committee goes to Norfolk Island

THIS WEEK, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works (the committee) will visit Norfolk Island, to conduct a site inspection and public hearing for its inquiry into the Multi-purpose Service Facility—Stage 1 Residential Aged Care Replacement project being proposed by the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sports and the Arts (the Department).

The Department is seeking parliamentary approval to deliver a new 16-bed residential aged care facility, mortuary, ancillary storage and warehouse structures, upgraded site-wide infrastructure (electrical, water supply, wastewater, stormwater, communications, roads and footpaths), and the demolition of redundant facilities.

The facilities aim to support the long-term needs and wellbeing of Norfolk Island’s ageing population. The total estimated cost of the proposed works is $51.6 million (excluding GST).

The committee will conduct a site inspection at the Norfolk Island Multi-Purpose Services Facility near the island’s main town centre at Burnt Pine and be briefed in private by Departmental officials on the project, prior to conducting a public hearing with Departmental witnesses later in the day.

Interested members of the public are welcome to attend the public hearing in person at the location listed below. The hearing will not be broadcast live due to telecommunication limitations on the Island, but will be uploaded to the Parliament’s website following the Committee’s return to Canberra.

Date: Thursday, 5 November 2026
Time: 
1pm – 1.40pm (NFDT)
Location: Sirius Room, Paradise Island Resort & Hotel

Note: the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works is not involved in the tendering process, awarding of contracts or details of the proposed works. Enquiries on these matters should be directed to the relevant Commonwealth entities.

 

ends

September building approvals rise, but Australia still faces shortfall say Master Builders

TODAYs ABS Building Approvals data for September shows a 5.1% monthly increase for new home building approvals. Detached house building approvals fell by 5.3%t, while higher-density approvals lifted by 24.6%.

Non-residential building approvals also rebounded, rising 45.9% in September after a sharp reduction during August.

Master Builders Australia chief economist Shane Garrett said the September results were encouraging but masked growing uncertainty.

“While it is positive to see approvals move higher, builders’ forward books are becoming increasingly uncertain," Mr Garrett said. "Our recently released forecasts show that new home building activity will decline steadily over the coming years and will be substantially lower than anticipated just six months ago.

“What has happened in six months? A deeply flawed Federal Budget, a conflict in the Middle East and higher interest rates. This has seen a building and construction slowdown, a situation that will result in less homes, infrastructure and buildings being delivered.

“The cost of delivering new homes has increased dramatically, rising by more than 50% since the pandemic. At the same time, the cost of building roads, bridges and non-residential projects has surged, placing further pressure on investment and project viability.

“Much of the increase in non-residential approvals appears to have been driven by major data centre projects. This rebound comes after non-residential approvals fell by 45.5 per cent in August,” Mr Garrett said.

Master Builders Australia CEO Denita Wawn said the figures highlighted the widening gap between the Federal Government’s stated ambitions and reality.

“September’s numbers are nowhere near the levels needed," Ms Wawn said. "The government was elected on a promise to boost housing supply. Their recent decisions are leading to the opposite. The reality on the ground is that builders and tradies continue to face rising costs, workforce shortages and growing uncertainty.

“Some 98% of building and construction businesses are small businesses. These tradies need lower costs, greater certainty and policies that encourage investment and growth.

“Builders didn’t create the current crisis, but they stand ready to help solve it. What they need is a policy environment that supports, rather than hinders.”

www.masterbuilders.com.au

 

ends

Federal Labor Government 'puts a price on protection' says ASRC

THE Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC) has condemned new and unexpected Federal Government regulations that force people seeking asylum to pay $1,863.50 upfront to challenge a protection visa refusal, warning "the changes will create yet another barrier to safety for some of the most marginalised people in Australia".

The changes, which came into effect on November 1, require people seeking an independent review of a protection visa refusal by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) to pay the fee before their application can proceed. The fee applies regardless of a person's financial circumstances.

Deputy CEO of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre, Jana Favero said "people who have fled war, persecution and violence seeking safety in our community, will now be expected to find more than $1,800 simply to challenge a bureaucratic decision that could determine whether they are returned to danger. 

She said women fleeing domestic, family and gender-based violence, people who have survived torture and trauma, and families struggling to put food on the table and pay for basic medicines are among those who could be prevented from accessing an independent review because they cannot afford the fee.

For people already forced into poverty and destitution, she said, finding $1,863.50 to exercise their right to challenge a protection decision will be impossible, particularly when they must also find legal assistance and prepare a complex application, all within the strict 28-day deadline to seek review.

The Administrative Review Tribunal exists to provide an independent and accessible mechanism for people to challenge bureaucratic decisions and hold decision-makers accountable. The new regulations undermine that fundamental purpose by making access to review dependent on a person's financial resources.

The Federal Government has justified the changes as a measure to discourage people from exploiting the protection visa system to prolong their stay in Australia. However, the ASRC has warned that this approach "once again targets people who are vulnerable to exploitation, rather than those who profit from exploiting them".

The ASRC is calling on the Federal Government to immediately reverse the upfront fee requirement and ensure that every person seeking protection has access to a fair and independent review, regardless of their financial circumstances.

"Every day at the ASRC, we see people skipping meals, going without essential medication and struggling to feed their children because they've been forced into poverty and destitution by a system that is stacked against them," Ms Favero said. "The government now expects families seeking asylum to come up with $1,863 just to challenge a decision that could see them returned to persecution or violence.

‘’There are a range of reasons why people’s claims are not recognised initially, perhaps the department got it wrong or people need time to clearly express and unpack the worst moments in their lives," Ms Favero said. "Having the ability to challenge a flawed decision that is fundamental to their safety shouldn’t come at a prohibitive financial cost.

"Nobody's right to challenge a government decision that could put their life in danger should depend on how much money they have in their bank account.

“You cannot fix a broken system by punishing people trapped in it. We have put forward a range of fair alternatives to reform the migration system. However, yet again those in power are targeting people in our community with the least rights.”

www.asrc.org.au

 

ends

 

Public hearing to examine educational attainment and the foundations of learning

THE  House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education will hold public hearings for its inquiry into the factors driving educational attainment on November 2 and 10.

The hearings will explore how educational attainment is defined, measured and influenced by children's early experiences and development. Leading experts in education and child development, education research and policy, and parents’ groups will help the Committee better understand what is meant by educational attainment and the measures currently used to assess educational outcomes.

Committee Chair, Tim Watts MP, said the hearings would provide important context for the inquiry's examination of the drivers of educational attainment.

"Educational attainment is a term that is widely used, but it can mean different things in different contexts," Mr Watts said. "We want to better understand how attainment is measured, what those measures capture, and the factors that influence outcomes throughout a student's educational journey.

"The committee looks forward to hearing from experts and stakeholders whose evidence will contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors influencing learning outcomes from the earliest years of life through to school subject choices and career pathways," he said.

Public hearing

Date: Monday, 2 November 2026
Time: 10.30am – 4.15pm
Location: Committee Room 1R4, Parliament House, Canberra

Date: Tuesday, 10 November 2026
Time: 10.30am – 3.15pm
Location: Committee Room 1R4, Parliament House, Canberra

There will be a live audio only broadcast of the hearing via the Australian Parliament House website and YouTube.

 

ends

Defence Committee to review proposed legislative frameworks for defence capability and security

THE Parliamentary Joint Committee on Defence has commenced a review of the Defence Legislation Amendment (Accelerating Capability and Protecting Bases) Bill 2026.

Committee Chair, Senator Deborah O’Neill, said, "In recent decades, defence capability development has become increasingly complex, involving advanced technologies and collaboration across a range of sectors and jurisdictions.

"This Bill introduces important legislative reforms that support Defence to build capability faster and protect it more effectively. The reforms are intended to ensure Australia’s Defence legislation supports current and future capability requirements under the National Defence Strategy."

The Bill would amend the Defence Act 1903 to establish a Defence Capability Framework to support capability development and preparedness activities conducted in Australia. The framework would operate through capability declarations to enable specified capability development and preparedness activities.

It would also provide a single statutory mechanism for supporting complex capability activities between Defence and its industry and international partners.

The Bill would also establish a Defence Security Zone Framework to protect Defence personnel, activities, information and capability wherever Defence operates. The proposed framework provides for permanent, temporary, mobile or emergency Defence security zones, allowing for tailored security protections.

It would also consolidate fragmented arrangements and provide common powers, safeguards, offences and oversight mechanisms, and empower Defence to respond to emerging threats from uncrewed systems.

Additionally, the Bill contains safeguards to expand the roles of the committee and the Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force to include oversight of the operation of the proposed Defence Capability Framework and Defence Security Zone Framework.

Additional information on the review is available on the committee’s website.

The committee has invited submissions addressing the Bill by Tuesday, November 3.

Submissions should be prepared solely for this review and should not be published prior to being accepted by the committee.

Further information about making a submission can be found on the Parliament House website.

 

ends

Boosting cyber security in Australia’s small businesses: cross-sector perspectives

THE House Select Committee on Cyber Security for Small to Medium Sized Businesses and Organisationswill hold its final public hearings for the inquiry into cyber security for small to medium sized businesses and organisations on Monday, November 2 and Wednesday, November 4.

“As we come to the end of the public hearing program, a clear message has emerged from witnesses: cyber security support should be actionable, targeted and accessible for small and medium sized businesses and organisations,” Committee Chair Sally Sitou MP said.

“The remaining hearings will continue to examine how Australia’s small to medium sized businesses and organisations can be better supported by the Australian Government, with a focus on the different needs across sectors.

“We’ll meet with representatives from the insurance, telecommunications, health, education, early childcare, finance, legal and IT sectors.”

Detailed programs for the hearings will be available on the committee’swebsite, the hearings will be broadcast live at aph.gov.au/live.

Public Hearing Details

Date: Monday 2 November 2026
Time: 10am – 2:30pm (AEDT)
Location: Virtual

Date: Wednesday 4 November 2026
Time: 11:30am – 2:30pm (AEDT)
Location: Virtual

 

ends

Committee to discuss progressing a national solar panel circular economy

THE House of Representatives Standing Committee on Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water will hold a public hearing in Canberra with the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water on Wednesday, October 28, as part of its inquiry into solar panel reuse and recycling.

During 2026 the committee has held public hearings with stakeholders and specialists in photovoltaic research, product development, reuse and recycling and the integration of circular economy principles into Australia's solar panel industry.

Metropolitan and regional industry and research site visits have also been undertaken. The committee has explored optimising panel resource use and recovery, while optimising solar energy output, to combat the growing volume of ‘end-of-life’ solar panels.

At the December 2025 Energy and Climate Change Ministerial Council meeting, Australian jurisdictions agreed to progress a national solar panel product stewardship scheme. The Australian Government followed this by announcing, in January, a national solar panel recycling pilot.

Data and consultation feedback from the pilot is designed to inform a national product stewardship approach. At the hearing on Wednesday, the committee will discuss these initiatives with the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, and consider how evidence received throughout the inquiry may inform future policy development.

Committee Chair, Anne Urquhart MP, said, “The committee has asked the department to reappear to discuss initiatives designed to support a circular economy for solar panels. These initiatives aim to divert ever increasing volumes of solar panel waste from landfill, reduce excessive stockpiling and exporting of used panels, and recover valuable resources for reuse.

“Australia has been a global leader in the uptake of solar energy. We now have an opportunity to show similar leadership in how we manage solar panels at the end of their life, creating environmental and economic benefits for communities across the country,” Ms Urquhart said.

The inquiry was referred to the committee on January 19 his year by the Minister for the Environment and Water, Senator Murray Watt.

Public hearing details:

Date:               Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Time:               10am to 11am AEDT
Location:         Committee Room 1R6, Parliament House, ACT 2600

The hearing will be audio broadcast live at aph.gov.au/live.

Further information, including the terms of reference, can be found on the committee’s website.

 

ends

New trust tax would add growing pressure on small businesses says HIA

THE Housing Industry Association (HIA) is warning that small businesses across Australia are facing mounting pressure from the combined impact of rising costs, economic uncertainty and an increasing number of regulatory and tax changes.

The proposed minimum 30% tax on discretionary trusts risks becoming the latest addition to a growing list of changes that are increasing costs and complexity for small businesses.

HIA chief executive for industry and policy, Simon Croft, said the key challenge for small business was that policy changes were too often assessed individually, rather than through the lens of their cumulative impact.

"Small business owners don't experience each policy change in isolation. They experience them all at once and together," Mr Croft said.

"Businesses are already dealing with rising operating costs, workforce shortages, economic uncertainty and softer trading conditions in many parts of the economy.

"At the same time, they are being asked to adapt to a growing range of regulatory and workplace changes. Whether it is additional payroll obligations, minimum wage increases, superannuation changes, credit card payment reforms or tax measures, every new requirement adds another layer of administration, compliance and cost."

Mr Croft said the proposed minimum tax on discretionary trusts is the latest example of a reform that needs to be considered in the context of the broader operating environment facing small businesses.

"Viewed in isolation, any one reform may appear manageable. But for a small business owner trying to run a business, employ staff and serve customers, it is the accumulation of all these changes that creates pressure.

"HIA estimates around three in five members operate through discretionary trusts. These are predominantly small and family-owned businesses including builders, tradespeople and contractors," Mr Croft said.

"The proposed trust tax would represent another cost and compliance burden for businesses that are already navigating significant economic and regulatory challenges, and disproportionately impact smaller businesses."

Mr Croft said small businesses continued to be the backbone of the housing industry and the broader economy, taking risks, investing capital, employing workers and training the next generation of skilled tradespeople.

"Every additional layer of compliance takes time away from running a business and getting on site building homes," Mr Croft said.

"Business owners consistently tell us they are spending more time dealing with paperwork and regulatory obligations and less time being on site delivering homes training their employees and growing their business.

“If governments are serious about improving productivity, increasing housing supply and supporting small business investment, they need to better understand the cumulative impact of the decisions they are making.

"HIA's concern is not just with one proposal. It is with the layering effect of multiple policy changes that, taken together, make it harder to operate a small business in Australia,” Mr Croft said.

www.hia.com.au

 

ends

Public Works Committee presents Report 6/2026

TODAY, Tony Zappia MP, Chair of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works, presented the Public Works Committee’s sixth report of 2026 to the House of Representatives.

Report 6/2026 – Referrals made in May, June, and August 2026 considers five proposed major works:

  • Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation—Campus Utilities Building Project, Lucas Heights;
  • Department of Defence—Facilities to Support Air Mission Training System Project [East Sale, Victoria];
  • Department of Employment and Workplace Relations—Proposed Fit-out of New Leased Premises at London Central, 40-60 London Circuit, Canberra City;
  • Department of Defence—Facilities to Support AIR 6500 Integrated Air and Missile Defence Command and Control (Package 1) – RAAF Base Darwin, Northern Territory; and 
  • Australian Taxation Office—Proposed Fit-out of New Leased Premises, Festival Tower 2, King William Road, Adelaide.

The committee has recommended that the House of Representatives approve each of the proposed works, with one additional recommendation relating to the Australian Taxation Office’s broader property management processes.

Mr Zappia said, "The works considered by the committee on this occasion are necessary and agencies have demonstrated that their proposals represent value for money for the Commonwealth.

"In relation to the proposed fit-out works by the ATO in Adelaide, the committee heard during its inquiry that some people within the Adelaide community have concerns around the appropriateness of the Festival Tower 2 development. That development, however, is a matter for the South Australian Planning Commission and the Committee does not express an opinion on it," he said.

"While the committee is recommending expediency be granted by the House of Representatives for these proposed works, over the course of this and other recent referrals from the ATO, the committee has developed concerns regarding the ATO’s overall approach to the identification of new sites and its exit strategies from leases of existing sites.

"For this reason, the committee is additionally recommending that the Auditor-General considers conducting an audit into the management and administration of the ATO’s property portfolio, lease arrangements and location strategy," Mr Zappia said.

Background on the proposed works

The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) is proposing to replace the existing Low Voltage (LV) backup power network at its site at Lucas Heights, NSW, with a new, centralised High Voltage (HV) backup power network. The proposed works will address issues associated with the ageing existing system, including long lead times, technical obsolescence and increasing repair cost, and misalignment of the existing system with the future needs of the campus. The proposed works do not affect ANSTO’s OPAL multi-purpose reactor, which operates on a separate dedicated power network. The estimated cost of the proposed works is $31.02 million (excluding GST).

The Department of Defence is proposing works for the Air Mission Training Support project at the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Base at East Sale, Victoria. The proposed works will deliver necessary infrastructure to support the training of future Air Force personnel, including mission controllers, mission aircrew, operations officers, and air traffic controllers. The proposed infrastructure will allow Defence to utilise new simulation systems, training techniques and additional trainee throughput. The estimated cost of the proposed works is $130.8 million (excluding GST).

The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) is proposing to fit-out 46,389 square metres of new leased premises at London Central, 40-60 London Circuit, Canberra City. The new premises will allow DEWR to consolidate staff from its existing five leases into one, accommodating approximately 4,393 staff from DEWR and the Department of Education. The estimated cost of the proposed works is $153.5 million (excluding GST).

The Department of Defence seeks parliamentary approval to deliver fit-for-purpose facilities and infrastructure at RAAF Base Darwin to support the AIR 6500 Integrated Air and Missile Defence Command and Control capability. The proposed works address investment priorities under the 2026 National Defence Strategy and the 2026 Integrated Investment program by providing facilities to support the Australian Defence Force’s air and missile defence capabilities. The work elements to be delivered include a new Operations Support Facility with secure briefing rooms, training rooms, working accommodation and maintenance and operational warehouse facilities, new vehicle shelters, and the upgrade of existing infrastructure to support additional buildings within the Base. The estimated cost of the proposed works is $299.1 million (excluding GST).

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) seeks parliamentary approval to undertake a fit-out of 19,000sqm across 11 floors of new leased premises at Festival Tower 2 in Adelaide City. The new accommodation will allow the ATO to reduce its office footprint in Adelaide from 31,488sqm to 19,000sqm and meet the Federal Government’s occupational density target of no more than 14sqm per occupied workpoint. The estimated cost of the proposed works is $73.4 million (excl. GST).

Note: the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works is not involved in the tendering process, awarding of contracts or details of the proposed works. Enquiries on these matters should be directed to the relevant Commonwealth entities.

 

ends

PJCIS supports Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission reforms

THE Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) has today presented to the Parliament an advisory report for its Review of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) reform package 2026.

The reform package consists of the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission Bill 2026 and the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (National Policing Information Charges) Bill 2026. The bills would establish the ACIC under a new Act, clarifying its role and enhancing its ability to obtain, analyse, evaluate and communicate intelligence relevant to serious and organised crime.

The PJCIS supports the passage of both bills, subject to 25 recommendations aimed at strengthening safeguards and ensuring a smooth transition to the new legal framework.

Chair of the PJCIS, Senator Raff Ciccone, said, “Serious and organised crime causes extensive harm to the Australian community. The ACIC is a key agency tasked with enhancing Australia’s response to this threat by collecting and communicating intelligence relating to serious and organised criminal activities.

“The committee supports these reforms, which will help clarify the ACIC’s mission and ensure its legal framework is appropriately adapted to its task. The committee has recommended amendments to improve clarity, accountability, oversight mechanisms and other safeguards, particularly in relation to the ACIC’s coercive powers.

“These recommendations will help ensure the public can have confidence that the reform package provides the right legislative settings for the ACIC’s long-term future and that the ACIC’s extraordinary powers are used only as intended to help keep Australians safe from serious and organised crime.”

The full report and further information about the inquiry are available on the committee’s website: aph.gov.au/pjcis

 

ends

Senate inquiry must put the trust tax modelling on the table says Family Business Association

THE Family Business Association (FBA) has welcomed the Senate inquiry into the proposed minimum tax on discretionary trusts and is calling on the Senate Economics Legislation Committee to publish the economic modelling and regulatory impact statement, and to consult family businesses of all sizes.

The Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 3) Bill 2026 and its companion rates bill were referred to the committee on October 15. Submissions close on October 29 with hearings on November 5 and 6.

FBA CEO Catherine Sayer said the inquiry will be the first public test of the proposed system. FBA has sought the modelling since May, but two rounds of Treasury consultation have passed without it and the Senate is now being asked to vote on a $4.5 billion tax on figures nobody outside Treasury has seen. Ms Sayer said.

The FBA’s position is that two weeks is too short to examine a measure of this size, given its long-term effects on the economy and community.

The FBA's position is that the Senate Economics Legislation Committee must publish the economic modelling and regulatory impact, and consult the families of all sizes that the tax will hit.

"Since May we have asked the government to show us the modelling," Ms Sayer said. "Two rounds of Treasury consultation have come and gone without it, and the Senate is now being asked to vote on a $4.5 billion tax on figures nobody outside Treasury has seen," Ms Sayer said.

"Two weeks is a short time to examine a measure of this size. It is a critically important issue that should not be rushed. It is going to have long-term impacts on the economy and community and needs to be carefully considered "

Ms Sayer said the committee's first question was what the sector looks like once the current generation of owners has handed over.

"This is not a tax on this year's profit," she said. "It decides whether the next generation takes the business on or sells it. That question has not been asked, let alone modelled.  We do not want to look back in 10 years’ time and wonder what has happened to all the family businesses in Australia."

Ms Sayer said the bill also did not work for a family that runs a business through a trust today.

"The 30% is a floor, not a rate," she said. "The election locks a family's distribution split for life and cannot be used to keep profit in the business for a new truck or a new press brake. No trust formed after July 1, 2028, can elect at all. And the restructure path relies on stamp duty relief that is still unclear that the states will give.

"Stacked on the increasing cost of doing business, productivity challenges, increasing compliance costs, the recent card surcharge ban and the stamp duty question along with the enormous cost to restructure, small and family businesses face death by a thousand cuts. These businesses employ half the Australian workforce."

FBA will lodge its submission by October 29 and will seek to appear before the committee.

Family Business Association is the peak body for family businesses in Australia. Around 70% of Australian businesses are family businesses and they employ around half the workforce.

www.familybusiness.org.au

 

ends