The Queensland Resources Council (QRC) welcomed the June release of the State Government’s Ports Strategy, which shows an environmentally responsible and sustainable approach to future development, and in particular alongside the iconic Great Barrier Reef.

The strategy is the Queensland Government's blueprint for managing and improving the efficiency and environmental management of the state's port network over the next decade. 

QRC Chief Executive Michael Roche said the strategy’s focus on driving economic growth through five long-established Priority Port Development Areas (PPDAs) recognised the export sector’s proud record of working responsibly alongside the Great Barrier Reef for many decades.

"The Queensland Ports Strategy is supported by the resources industry and restricts new port development adjacent to the reef, and containing development to the long-running existing ports of Abbot Point; Gladstone; Hay Point and Mackay; and Townsville," Mr Roche said.

"The incremental expansion of these ports has been fundamental to Queensland’s economic and social progress over more than a century.

"Their continuing operation under the scrutiny of state, federal and international environmental agencies is fundamental to Queensland’s global trade in coal, minerals, gas, sugar and grain."

Exports through ports adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef were worth $40 billion in 2012-13.

The latest benchmark for responsible port development quashes the false claims put forward by the WWF in its latest reef scare campaign.

"Once again the anti-resources activists have been caught out in their latest scaremongering campaign that features old re-runs of Bob Irwin’s Fight for the Reef TV advertisements," Mr Roche said.

"All of the false claims put forward in the ad – which we have seen before – are wrong, including the number of coal ships that will export from the ports and claims of fast-tracking mega industrial ports.

"The WWF ads have Mr Irwin claiming that 7,000 coal ships will be 'crossing the reef'.

"No coal ships cross the reef - they in fact travel through designated naturally occurring shipping channels.

"The official forecast from the Australian Maritime Safety Authority is that by 2020 some 2,450 coal ships will be using the coal ports in the reef zone.

"The Ports Strategy also sends a clear message that UNESCO should be in no doubt over the commitment of the Queensland Government and industry to deliver the twin goals of economic growth and environmental protection," Mr Roche said.

"In this day and age, we don’t have to sacrifice one for the other, as many decades of productive co-existence have demonstrated."

www.qrc.org.au

ends

VECCI Chief Executive Mark Stone said the chamber has welcomed the announcement by the Victorian Minister for Planning, Matthew Guy, that approval has been given for the eastern section of the East West Link project. 

"VECCI has long advocated for this vital piece of infrastructure to be built in its entirety, including the port connection, and this announcement is another step towards this becoming a reality," Mr Stone said.

"As reinforced in our Taking Care of Business state election agenda, VECCI ranks East West Link as the number one infrastructure project for Victoria. 

"By reducing congestion it will increase the capacity of Melbourne’s transport network, unlock productivity gains for business and improve social amenity, particularly in Melbourne’s expanding residential areas."

vecci.org.au

The Victorian Employers' Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VECCI) is the peak body for employers in Victoria, informing and servicing more than 15,000 members, customers and clients around the state.

ends

ends

RETAIL figures recorded its biggest monthly fall in more than a year when retail sales for May were released today, according to analysis from the Australian National Retailers’ Association (ANRA).

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released retail figures today showing a decrease of 0.5 percent in May compared to April. April’s figure was also revised down to record the first fall in eleven months (down 0.1%). Throughout the year to May retail turnover rose 4.6 percent.

ANRA CEO Margy Osmond said the Abbott government’s first Budget has halted much of the momentum the sector generated over the past year.

“Today’s figures are exactly what retailers were hoping to avoid. The discretionary spend categories have been hit the hardest with consumers pulling back on spending in the lead up to and following the Federal Budget.

“The biggest fall was seen in department stores (down 2.6 per cent), erasing any gains recorded in April. Clothing, footwear and personal accessories, other retailing and household goods also recorded falls in May.

“This is the third month in a row the clothing, footwear and personal accessories, household goods and other retailing categories have recorded decreases.

“Food continued its resilience, recording the only rises amongst the categories in May up 0.1 per cent and cafes, restaurants and takeaway food services also up 0.1 percent.

“Food has now outperformed non-food for seven of the last twelve months. Year-on-year food is up 6.8 percent while non-food is up only 2.1 per cent and on shaky ground.

“Looking to the states and territories, Victoria recorded the biggest fall – down 1.1%. Contributing to the state’s drop in May was recreational goods (down 10%), speciality foods (down 6%) and department stores (down 5%).

“It’s also the fifth consecutive month of declining sales for Western Australia and it isn’t a rosy picture for the ACT either, where retail sales have declined for six out of the last seven months.

“Year-on-year, Tasmania continues to be the strongest performer amongst the states and territories – up 8.8 per cent. The ACT was the worst performer – down 0.9 per cent.

“Consumers are showing all the signs in May of being spooked by the Federal Budget and its cuts to family benefits. We normally see some softening of confidence after a Budget with a pick in the June figures.  With many aspects of the Budget facing a battle to get through the Senate and ongoing uncertainty, we wouldn’t expect retail sales to bounce back for a few months yet,” said Ms Osmond.

www.anra.com.au

ends

IN recent months the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) has made completely untrue and repeated assertions that AMMA is “misrepresenting” the wages earned by maritime employees in the offshore oil and gas maritime industry.

The latest example of this is another untruthful assertion in today’s West Australian newspaper.
It is time for the MUA to cease running its inaccurate and tired campaign deliberately confusing rates of pay between their maritime members and higher paid offshore construction workers, in an attempt to vilify the real position of AMMA and the companies that employ their members.

For the record, AMMA has never stated maritime workers are responsible for cost overruns on any resource sector project. We have never claimed the maritime workers represented by the MUA are earning wages in excess of $350,000 per annum.

Any public statements on such extraordinarily high wages for offshore cooks, kitchen hands or barge welders have always been referencing offshore construction rates, paid to workers who are eligible and usually covered by other non-maritime trade unions.

Examples include AMMA’s media statement on 29 April 2014, and a prominent opinion editorial in The Australian newspaper on May 16, 2013. We have also referenced offshore construction salaries in this graph, using data derived from registered with the Fair Work Commission and publicly available.

In these statements, it is very clear that we are talking about offshore construction rates, not the rates paid to MUA eligible maritime employees.

Moreover, on several occasions AMMA has publicly clarified the remuneration being paid to maritime workers, whom are firstly employees of our offshore support members and secondly members of the MUA, are in the vicinity of $170-$240,000.

Public statements where we cite these maritime wages include on 23 May 2014; 28 February 2014; and in data provided for a Deloitte Access Economics report, published last year.

Attached here for the public record are full-year wage calculations for lower paid (general support vessels) and higher paid (construction support vessels) maritime employees in the offshore resource sector. The data shows the Maritime Schedule 1 occupation pays up to $183,000 per year, while the Maritime Schedule 8 occupation pays more than $247,000 per year.

We can only assume the MUA is continuing to misinform the public and its members about AMMA’s position to deflect from the union’s reckless industrial campaigns that damage the reputation of an industry that directly employs 2,500 maritime workers and creates 10,000 jobs in flow-on effects.

It is time the MUA’s officials be responsible in industry negotiations and work towards sustainable and fair wage increases for their members in the future.

Such an approach would be in the greater interests of securing more investment into future oil and gas projects and providing further opportunities for maritime workers and their families.

www.amma.org.au

ends