Skip to main content

Business News Releases

Doing the basics right in infrastructure spending

THE Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit has tabled its report on Commonwealth Infrastructure Spending based on the Auditor-General’s reports No. 14 (2015–16) Approval and Administration of Commonwealth Funding for the East West Link Project and No. 38 (2016–17) Approval and Administration of Commonwealth Funding for the WestConnex Project.

The inquiry highlighted the important role Infrastructure Australia plays in assessing infrastructure projects and determined that departing from full assessments of the East West Link and WestConnex projects reduced the evidence bases for decision-making, including full business cases.

The Committee concluded this approach is best avoided given the scale of public funding and the risks involved in infrastructure projects.

The Commonwealth contributed $1.5 billion in payments to both the East West Link and WestConnex projects as well as providing a $2 billion concessional loan for WestConnex.

The Committee noted the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development provided advice to the Government on various matters in the lead-up to funding decisions but was concerned at the Department’s lack of consideration of some issues in designing and negotiating the WestConnex loan.

The Committee was also concerned about the Department’s project payments and management of milestones.

Committee Chair Senator Dean Smith said the Department needed to give greater consideration to each of the concessions and risks involved in designing Commonwealth concessional loans and include this in its advice to decision-makers.

“The Department needs to better protect the Commonwealth’s interests when managing milestones to provide genuine incentives for funding recipients to progress projects and reduce the likelihood of payments being made too far in advance of need and delivery,” Senator Smith said.

The report makes five recommendations to the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, including:

  • providing clear advice to Ministers on whether the requirements of land transport legislation have been met;
  • only making significant payments when they are required by a project and meet agreed milestones, and advising Ministers of any interest charges, other costs and risks arising from advance payment proposals;
  • requiring loan proponents to identify alternative funding strategies and justify why a Commonwealth loan would be the best funding option;
  • reviewing the Department’s approach to drafting project approval instruments to identify relevant risks and incorporate mitigations; and
  • reviewing the Department’s infrastructure IT system to improve its recording of milestones, the quality of data it receives from project delivery agencies and capturing more specific expenditure data.

Two further recommendations made by the Committee include:

  • the Auditor-General consider a follow-up audit of the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development’s administration of a concessional loan to the Sunshine Coast Airport expansion project; and
  • Treasury review the funding recovery provision in the Federal Financial Relations Act 2009 to consider the suitability of the current discretion applied to recover funding as well as the current inability to recover interest earned on unspent National Partnership payments.

Interested members of the public may wish to track the committee via the website.

ends

  • Created on .

Activism pays off - in the price of your power bill, says QRC chief

THE anti-gas green activist campaign has hobbled development in the southern states and is a significant factor in pushing electricity prices up, Queensland Resources Council (QRC) chief executive Ian Macfarlane has claimed.

"Yesterday the federal government made the extraordinary announcement that it would intervene in the free market due to a shortage of gas in the east coast market, which has led to skyrocketing power bills for households and businesses," Mr Macfarlane said.

Mr Macfarlane said it was mind-boggling that foreign- funded green activists had influenced energy policy in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and the Northern Territory, leading to gas shortages, blackouts and electricity prices going through the roof.

“New South Wales has excellent gas deposits that haven’t been developed because state politicians have buckled in the face of the relentless anti-gas green activist campaign,” Mr Macfarlane said.

“Short-sighted NSW only produces about 5 percent of the gas supply it needs, which means it relies on other states like Queensland for its supply so households and businesses can keep this lights on.

“While NSW is in a state of gas panic, they expect Queensland to keep sending our maroon gas molecules south to keep their lights on at ANZ stadium tonight.

“But NSW is not alone, Victoria has a moratorium on all onshore gas, the South Australian Liberal opposition has pledged a gas ban, and the Northern Territory has a temporary moratorium.”

It is important to remember the gas export hub at Gladstone was approved because there was an expectation that NSW would go ahead and develop its own gas, but due to extreme green activist campaigns, NSW gas has been left in the ground, leaving the east coast in a state of panic over out-of-control prices for electricity and gas, Mr Macfarlane said.

www.qrc.org.au

ends

  • Created on .

National Irrigators’ Council to appear at water use efficiency hearing

THE House Agriculture and Water Resources Committee will hold a public hearing in Canberra on Thursday, 22 June for its inquiry into water use efficiency in Australian agriculture.

The Committee will hear from the National Irrigators’ Council.

Public hearing details: 12:15pm - 1:30pm, Thursday 22 June, Committee Room 1R2, Parliament House, Canberra

The hearing will be broadcast live in audio format at aph.gov.au/live

Interested members of the public may wish to track the committee via the website.

ends

  • Created on .

Driverless vehicles inquiry motors on

SAFETY, employment, legal concerns, public transport, infrastructure needs, access and equity and Australia’s role in driverless vehicle technology – all topics are on the table as the parliamentary driverless vehicle inquiry holds its final public hearing in Canberra this morning.

The Industry, Innovations, Science and Resources Committee will be hearing from the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development and the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science as it wraps up its public hearings for its inquiry into the social impacts of driverless vehicles.

The Committee has heard from 30 organisations and individual witnesses and held four inspections over the course of the inquiry.

Committee Chair Michelle Landry MP commented that members of the Committee were looking forward to being able to follow up with the two departments on some of the questions that have arisen throughout the inquiry.

“We have heard from a wide range of stakeholders – from manufacturers, regulators, industry groups, academics and many others – about the social issues relating to driverless vehicles," Ms Landry said. 

"Today we will get the chance to discuss some of the issues we’ve heard about with representatives of the Commonwealth departments responsible for infrastructure and industry and innovation.”

Public hearing details: 10.45am – 12.30pm, Wednesday 21 June, Committee Room 1R3, Parliament House, Canberra

The hearing will be broadcast live at aph.gov.au/live

Interested members of the public may wish to track the committee via the website

ends

  • Created on .

Law Council to discuss Brexit and UK trade

HOW should Brexit affect the work of Australian lawyers in the United Kingdom? At a hearing in Canberra today, the Law Council of Australia will have its say.

The Trade Sub-Committee of the Parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade will hear from the Law Council at a public hearing today for its inquiry into Australia’s trade and investment relationship with the United Kingdom.

The Law Council, which is the peak representative body for the Australian legal profession, believes the decision by the UK to leave the European Union should not diminish the current level of access for Australian lawyers into the UK and should potentially expand access.

The Law Council’s submission says any proposed trade agreement with the UK should recognise the importance of multi-jurisdictional legal services in facilitating two-way trade and investment without costly legal disputes and possible failure. It supported the free movement of legal service providers from Australia and the UK.

The submission also raises concerns that as a consequence of Brexit, Australian legal firms and lawyers may no longer be in a position to recommend their clients to set up companies in the UK under the laws of England and Wales due to the uncertainties of post-Brexit trading rules and tariffs when trading with the EU.

Public hearing details: 10:05am - 11:00am, Wednesday 21 June, Committee Room 2S1, Parliament House, Canberra

The hearing will be broadcast live at aph.gov.au/live

Interested members of the public may wish to track the committee via the website

ends

  • Created on .